1. Got a question or need help troubleshooting? Post to the troubleshooting forum or Search the forums!

Solved How to calibrate Z axis motion

Discussion in 'Troubleshooting' started by Drmike, Feb 21, 2016.

  1. Drmike

    Drmike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    11
    So I got a new power supply and now I can print the MatterControl calibration ring all the way through. The X and Y motions are perfect, and the extruder is pushing out correct amounts of plastic. The first layer is beautiful and the second is ok, but then the nozzle goes a bit higher with each layer so that by the time it gets to the top layer it is about 2 mm above the ring and it makes very pretty waves as the plastic lays down.

    I am using T-glase with the temp at 238, bed at 60, physical nozzle is 0.4 but I followed the guidelines and set that to 0.5 in the settings. I also set layer height to .4 with first layer at .3. Perimeters: 1.2; top and bottom 1.2 mm.
    Infill 100%, Travel 150 mm/sec, all others 16mm/sec. First layer speed 30% (I assume of 16). Filament 1.75mm (I don't think retraction applies for the ring, but the settings were 0.5mm lift, 1mm move, 20mm min).

    I did not touch any of the G code, so the default startup is:
    G28 X0 Y0 Z0;
    G1 Z5 F5000;
    M109 S[temperature];
    G28 X0 Y0 Z0;
    G29;

    The bed levelling works great - the first layer is perfect. There are supposed to be 4 layers of material, and it should be 1.5 high (.3 + 3*0.4). But the last layer is being printed at 3 or more.

    Since X and Y are perfect (the ring is 14 cm in diameter and is closer to round than I can measure) I would think Z should be good too. Do I have a setting screwed up, or do I have to change something so it moves Z correctly?
    Dr. mike
     
  2. mark tomlinson

    mark tomlinson ༼ つ ◕_ ◕ ༽つ
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Messages:
    23,915
    Likes Received:
    7,338
    Sounds like you might have the incorrect version of the firmware installed. One that has the wrong Z steps/mm.
    Exactly which printer do you have? Beta, R1, R1+? Any changes to the Z rods (like a leadscrew upgrade if you have a beta or a regular R1)?
     
  3. mark tomlinson

    mark tomlinson ༼ つ ◕_ ◕ ༽つ
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Messages:
    23,915
    Likes Received:
    7,338
    The reason this matters is that the Beta had SAE (5/16) Z axis rods, the R1 had (I think) 8mm threaded rods and the R1+ has the leadscrews :)
     
  4. Drmike

    Drmike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    11
    It's a brand new R1+. I changed the software using the Firmware download to change the baud rate. I would not be surprised - there is a note on that web page to NOT use it to upgrade the R1+. All I changed was the baud rate - so it should be easy enough to change anything else. I just need to know what bits to flip, otherwise I'll make things a lot worse!

    Thanks!

    Edit: in Configuration.h there is a line DEFAULT_AXIS_STEP_PER_UNIT {80, 80, 2560, 723.38}
    Is that what I need to change?
     
    #4 Drmike, Feb 21, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2016
  5. mark tomlinson

    mark tomlinson ༼ つ ◕_ ◕ ༽つ
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Messages:
    23,915
    Likes Received:
    7,338
    Yes, what you change it to depends on which model you have. Those numbers are correct for an original BETA unit. for yours (and R1+) that 2560 needs to be : 800
     
  6. mark tomlinson

    mark tomlinson ༼ つ ◕_ ◕ ༽つ
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Messages:
    23,915
    Likes Received:
    7,338
  7. Drmike

    Drmike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    11
    Excellent, thanks! I just have to make sure I change just the baud rate. I will give it a shot.
     
  8. Drmike

    Drmike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    11
    Perfection at last!! The calibration ring is perfectly round and solid and the plastic has the optical properties I'm looking for.
    Thanks to everyone - I really appreciate it!
    Dr. mike
     

Share This Page